Try the political quiz

3.3k Replies

 @ISIDEWITHDiscuss this answer...7yrs7Y

No

 @9F83YRN from Illinois disagreed…8mos8MO

The F-35 is the most advanced stealth fighter apart from the F-22 and must stay in production to maintain a technological edge against our enemies

 @ISIDEWITHDiscuss this answer...7yrs7Y

Yes

 @9FN9KM8 from Washington disagreed…8mos8MO

IF we don't have superiority in th military then others would, and we would be forced out as a world leader.

 @7PTCG38Democrat from Wisconsin answered…1yr1Y

No, the program is too far into production and service to cancel, but revise procurement procedures to avoid out of control and mismanaged costs with future military weapons programs

 @9CD7JJ3 from Virginia answered…11mos11MO

Yes but first fund development of a better replacement aircraft and only discontinue when the new planes are ready.

 @98PM9LCAmerican Solidarity from Kansas answered…1yr1Y

Yes, but continue to operate and provide upgrades for the existing F35 fleet.

 @97NWKHH from Oregon answered…2yrs2Y

No, the F-35 is the current pinnacle of stealth fighter technology. They are important to the national defense.

 @9CNWR6W from Tennessee answered…10mos10MO

No, but we should be more discerning about how much we pay defense contractors

 @9C9SCF3 from Texas answered…11mos11MO

No, decrease defense spending in general but complete the F-35 program so as to not waste what has already been invested.

 @7PTCG38Democrat from Wisconsin answered…1yr1Y

No, this weapons program is too far into production and service, but revise procurement procedures for future military weapons programs so that costs do not become so mismanaged and out of control

 @8WLN633 from Pennsylvania answered…3yrs3Y

 @8HBMN76 from California answered…4yrs4Y

We should reduce production of the F-35 fighter, but not cancel it, in case of losing global influence.

 @9FNPCYQ from Illinois answered…8mos8MO

yes, assuming the money saved is used on something to better U.S citizen's lives

 @9D2V2XG from Texas answered…10mos10MO

 @9CW6LJX from Texas answered…10mos10MO

 @8LT3BN2 from Rhode Island answered…4yrs4Y

 @8WZBZ33 from New York answered…3yrs3Y

 @8MMG3X8 from Kansas answered…4yrs4Y

 @99MFTPG from Washington answered…1yr1Y

 @98HG28L from Virginia answered…1yr1Y

 @9432S4FSocialist from Virginia answered…2yrs2Y

No, they are in too deep; however, more oversight should be placed on the project to ensure its completion in a quicker and more cost effective manner

 @942VB6C from California answered…2yrs2Y

Me like F35 and a10, both, both planes go "BRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRT"

 @8RHL36C from Illinois answered…3yrs3Y

Yes, why do we need it? we're already in a multi-trillion dollar deficit and we aren't in wartime.

 @8KG49V2Socialist from Michigan answered…4yrs4Y

Yes, they should put that money towards social and environmental causes instead

 @9MFX8R7 from Missouri answered…6hrs6H

The government should seek to have the world's dominant military force, and as such, has the right to choose which tools it uses.

 @9MFX724Peace and Freedom from Missouri answered…6hrs6H

Yes. The United States has graveyards of weaponry that goes unused and costs more money than one could ever conceptualize.

 @9MFMGP4 from Florida answered…13hrs13H

Yes, it is inferior to it’s Russian counterparts and should be replaced by a new model that emphasizes reliability, practicality, and the ability to be repaired in the field

 @9MFBRSL from North Carolina answered…17hrs17H

No, since canceling it at this point would cost more than finishing it, but we should find ways to streamline and cut production costs for future projects

 @9MDD3XT from Texas answered…2 days2D

We need to get our finances under control first, and concentrate on the climate and the problem of our poor and undeserved. This is fancy expense right now.

 @9MBZKP3 from Virginia answered…4 days4D

It has had known issues-but a lot of funds have been spent-investigate the reasons for why things have gone wrong.

 @9M7WCXZ from Indiana answered…1wk1W

No, but it should not be funded at the expense of true defense, rather than the “best defense is a good offense” policy.

 @9M4JRT9 from Texas answered…2wks2W

No, increase military strength and sophistication but do it within budget and have strict oversight to reduce fraud, waste and abuse

 @9M3KVCG from Florida answered…2wks2W

I think America needs to make better, more tactical efficient fighter jets that cost less money soon. Then they should cancel the F-35.

Engagement

The historical activity of users engaging with this question.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Demographics

Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion

Loading data...